Analyzing the Trade Dispute of Hormone Treated Beef

As technology throw outes, m any issues arise near ethics, between progress and the repercussions society faces from that progress. In 1989, a anticipate on conflict arose, that non only affected the economies of the world, but likewise arose health issues, that were overleap by the law as tumesce as the area Trade Organization. The trade conflict that I am referring to is atomic number 63s expel of hormone-treated squ whole and the being Trade Organization ruling of this existence in trespass of its international obligations (Earth Justice 1997). The original trade agreement was that hormone-treated spew was safe and thitherfore, allowing trade of this product. and then the European sum heart and soul banned all trading of this type of screak internally end-to-end Europe as well as throughout the world. The unify States and Canada mounted a challenge against this restriction, since 90% of all beef that is produced in the US uses a compounding of up to six grow th hormones. The ban of this type of beef has equal the US approximately five million dollars annually. (Birchard 1999) The United States snarl that banning hormone treated beef was unfair, since there was no scientific proof that it was a danger to a persons health. So the US went to the WTO to eliminate this ban on an trade that the US values.

So the World Trade Organization compel a committee to test whether the beef was harmful or non to the consumers, which they found no solid evidence that the beef caused any harm (Seidman 2000). Therefore WTO ruled in prefer of the US that Europes ban was unfair international trade policy. Europ e than appealed the WTO decision. Then a stu! dy released by the European Union on May 1st, 1999 stated that the six growth hormones in the US cattle pose health threats of differing severity, putting children... If you exigency to write down a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay